Elite coaching, powered by your biometrics.
Synchronizing biometric stream...
Calibrating structural models...
Stabilizing neural uplink...
Awaiting data packet finalization
The Architect is an independent analysis tool and is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by Zwift, Inc. or Rouvy or Whoop. Zwift, Whoop and Rouvy are trademarks of their respective owners. Support for .zwo and .fit files is provided for data interoperability and personal performance analysis only.
© 2026 VeloArchitect. All rights reserved.
Powered by Biometrics from WHOOP
For Time Trialists
For athletes racing the clock. The system treats every Watt as a deliverable against a closed-loop course profile.
Positioning
Time trialists race against a number, not a field. The training block must produce specific power-duration outputs that match the event profile: 8 minutes for a 10-mile TT, 20 minutes for a 40K, 55 minutes for a long road TT. Generic FTP-building plans misallocate load across the wrong durations. Veloarchitect reads each Athlete’s course profile and tailors Adaptive Workout dispatch accordingly.
The time-trialist segment demands protocol-level discipline. Whoop recovery tells the system when supra-threshold work is safe; Mechanical Efficiency tells it whether the Athlete is producing more power for the same cardiac cost than last block; Failure Horizon projects when the Athlete will miss the target output. Protocol 10 — Adaptive Workout — dispatches the interval set calibrated to the event duration, not the event calendar. A 40K Athlete gets 4×10 at 105% FTP; a 10-mile Athlete gets 2×8 at 115% FTP. The system does not collapse the two.
Protocols: Protocol 10 — Adaptive Workout; Protocol 11 — Failure Horizon; Protocol 15 — Indoor→Outdoor Translation
Why Veloarchitect Fits This Segment
Event-profile-matched interval dispatch — 4×10 for the 40K, 2×8 for the 10-mile, not a generic 4×8 for both.
Course-climb-aware Failure Horizon: mechanical-work accumulation reads against the Athlete’s target climb profile, not population averages.
Translation Factor computation (Protocol 15) for outdoor TTs starting from an indoor base.
Per-interval ZWO→FIT Delta trace, surfaced as the audit trail the Athlete reviews before race week.
Pacing rewrites inside the 7-day race window — the Athlete does not negotiate the .zwo file the week of the event.
Closed Loop
A .zwo file dispatched by Protocol 10 that targets the Athlete’s specific course profile: duration, climb density, expected temperature.
A .fit recording of the executed session, compared per-interval against the .zwo intent. ZWO→FIT Delta drives Execution Precision.
Mechanical Efficiency and FTP shifts logged against the Athlete’s 100-day True Normal. Adaptation Rate gates the next block.
Worked Example
Athlete: 38y/o, 282W FTP, 1.61 W/bpm Mechanical Efficiency, 142 indoor sessions in the last 100 days. Target event: 40K TT in 9 weeks, 280m of climbing, expected temperature 24°C. Block 1 (weeks 1–4): 3×40-minute Threshold Sustain at 92% FTP, weekly Z2 endurance, weekly Circadian Window-respected 4×10 VO₂max. Block 2 (weeks 5–7): 2×20 at 105% FTP, 1×40 at 100% FTP, taper compression in week 8. Mechanical Efficiency moves 1.61 → 1.68 W/bpm. FTP test on week 8: 296W (+14W). Failure Horizon projection for race day: 0.91 (clean execution expected). Race-day Execution Precision: 0.94.
Common assumption inverted
Time-trialists do not need “more FTP.” They need FTP at the right duration for the event. A 290W FTP Athlete with a 40K time of 54:30 has a pacing problem, not a power problem. Veloarchitect reads pacing against the Athlete’s course profile and rewrites the block to fix the specific deficit. The Athlete who adds 5W of FTP at the wrong duration will not improve their 40K time.
All Segments
See all ten narrow audience spokes or the platform comparison for the Veloarchitect-vs-field claims.
Related